Through most organizations the supply chain is disconnected. Each function manages its own P&L and logistics functions. Each part of the organization has its own goals and reports their results up to management. The purpose is to maximize the results for each individual group, thinking that this will improve the entire organization. But there is no thought to the negative effect on the whole organization or the affect on the customer. The individual groups focus on cost efficiency. It is of little consequence if the cost is pushed to another function within the organization. The result is that each function buffers inventory to avoid the vagaries in the production each department causes. This could be in supplies, raw material, work in process, semi finished or finished inventory. All this costs the organization as a whole, but may save the cost center, department or function for the moment.

The same is true for the supply chain. From the origination of the product, raw materials to the consumption by the ultimate consumer each step seeks to protect itself. If the focus is on cost when choosing suppliers, manufacturer, and distributor, the reality is this could cost more! Customer satisfaction and superior customer service suffer. I will explain how the lack of coordination through the supply chain costs the organization, and the customer.

In order to get the lowest price, the from a raw material supplier, assembly contractor or from a logistics supplier, multiple vendors are utilized, each competing to provide the lowest cost. In order to give the manufacturer the cheapest supplies, suppliers will “cut corners” to save money. They will supply materials at the minimum quality specification. This causes the manufacturer to test more incoming material and results in more handling, increasing costs. The supplier will increase their minimum order quantity, in order to take advantage of economy of scale, so the manufacturer has to place larger orders based on speculation of future orders. Thus the profit of the supplier is reduced and the inventory risk for the manufacturer increases.

Take an automotive company. They want to get the lowest possible price for plastic. They solicit bids from multiple suppliers, each supplier bids based on the guidelines of the automotive company. In order to cut cost of the material, the suppliers will supply the minimum quality required of the specification. They will require large orders to take advantage economies of scale. They will use the lowest cost delivery method. So the automotive company must increase their level of quality screening, increasing their cost for manufacturer. They can no longer receive the material on an expected day, but must accept a longer delivery window so the supplier can use cheaper delivery methods. The result will be production idled waiting for material, costing the manufacturer. The automotive company must store the increased amount of inventory, because of the higher minimum order quantity, and there is greater risk of stock outs due to longer delivery times.

So what is the solution? Information exchange and cooperation need to replace, the adversarial relationships. The supplier and the manufacturer must enter into a new “co-maker” relationship, where each party helps the other reduce costs, but not profit. When there is a free exchange of information both up and down the supply chain then each party can profit. This sharing of quality information through EDI, RosettaNet, of other form of immediate information exchange creates trust in the other. When each member of the supply chain can trust the other, every one profits and reduces cost for the ultimate consumer. The supplier is able to smooth the supply to the manufacturer and the manufacturer is able to smooth the production runs. Thus each realizes more profit and saves each other cost burdens.

VMI or Vendor Managed Inventory is a good example of how sharing information reduces the buffer stock that the supplier, the manufacturer and the retailer must maintain. The retailer sends POS or Point of Sale information the manufacturer. The manufacturer feeds production data to the supplier. The supplier stocks the manufacturer based on this information, and the manufacturer supplies the retailer. Ensuring there is a smooth replenishment and no stock outs.

This cooperation provides value to the consumer by allowing for the lower price, greater variety, improved quality, eliminates stock outs and higher profits for everyone.